September 26, 2025 by Albergo, Shmaruk & Kofman, LLC
Dog bite cases are among the most common personal injury claims in the United States, but the laws governing them vary from state to state. Many jurisdictions still follow the so-called “one bite rule,” which gives dog owners a degree of protection from liability the first time their dog bites someone—unless they had prior knowledge of the dog’s dangerous tendencies. New Jersey, however, takes a very different approach. Understanding the distinction between strict liability and the one bite rule is critical for both dog bite victims and pet owners.
Under the traditional one bite rule, a dog owner is not held automatically liable for injuries caused by their dog unless:
In practice, this means that a dog often gets one free bite before the owner can be sued successfully. Victims must prove the owner’s prior knowledge, which can be difficult if there are no documented complaints or incidents.
New Jersey rejects the one bite rule and instead imposes strict liability on dog owners. Under N.J.S.A. 4:19-16, if a dog bites someone in a public place or lawfully on private property, the owner is automatically liable for the injuries—regardless of whether the dog has ever bitten anyone before or whether the owner acted negligently.
This law applies to:
The victim does not need to prove that the dog had a dangerous history or that the owner failed to act responsibly. The only requirements are that the bite occurred and that the victim had a lawful right to be where the bite happened.
Strict liability makes it easier for dog bite victims to recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages, scarring, and pain and suffering. It removes the burden of proving the owner’s knowledge of the dog’s behavior, which is often the biggest challenge in one bite rule states.
However, victims still need to show that they were not trespassing or provoking the dog at the time of the incident. If the owner can prove that the victim was unlawfully on the property or deliberately provoked the animal, the claim may be denied or damages reduced.
New Jersey applies a modified comparative negligence rule to personal injury claims, including dog bite cases. If the victim’s own conduct contributed to the incident—such as teasing or harassing the dog—any award may be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the victim. If the victim is more than 50% responsible, they cannot recover damages.
If you are bitten by a dog in New Jersey:
New Jersey’s strict liability law provides strong protection for dog bite victims by holding owners accountable from the very first incident. Unlike states that follow the one bite rule, New Jersey does not require proof of prior attacks or owner negligence. This approach ensures that victims have a clearer path to compensation for their injuries. For dog owners, it is a reminder of the importance of training, supervision, and proper restraint to prevent bites before they happen.
